In Dungeons, you actually have to make them happy. In DK you only had to kill the hero’s or imprison/torture them depending on what you needed. There is one fundamental difference between the DK’s and Dungeons. All rather clever and unique really, it’s a shame that Bullfrog were never able to make Dungeon Keeper 3, I’m sure it would have been pretty special.Īnyway, we have Dungeons now which could probably be considered DK3. It was up to you to dig out the rooms and passageways, attract the monsters and create the traps that would kill any hero who was foolish enough to enter. Rather than playing the bold and dashing hero, entering dark and dangerous places looking for gold and treasure, in Dungeon Keeper you’re cast as the Lord of the dungeon itself. The fundamentals of Dungeon Keeper remain, and it’s been made all shiny and pretty.īullfrog made Dungeon Keeper and its sequel Dungeon Keeper II sometime in the late nineties, and for its time it was pretty mold-breaking.
But it still stays something currently not worth to invest the limited resources in.Quite honestly, I think it is and it doesn’t do a terrible job. Which in my books are quite different from nothing. But yeah its not like it breaks the game to not have it and I do understand it would take a lot of work, so fair enough is there not is the resources, but calling it only a gimmick that adds nothing to gameplay is jsut plain false Where did I say that it would had nothing? If I look at my quote and original post I said "barely anything to actual gameplay". But as said still nice to have, but when you look it at the way how much work it needs I can live without it ) Well first of, I thought it was pretty obvious that would be a joke.īeside that calling it a gimmick that adds nothing is NOT true, as I pointed out if done like in DK2 at least it certainly had uses, possesing an imp you could dig out and claim areas at a BLAZING fast speed (and since there is no claiming of areas in this game it would be even faster in a way) as the most obvious example. And yes it is nothing more then that a gimmick that brings barely anything to actual gameplay. Originally posted by Ydyp:You know this isn't the first attempt to bring up this nice to have gimmick. But yeah its not like it breaks the game to not have it and I do understand it would take a lot of work, so fair enough is there not is the resources, but calling it only a gimmick that adds nothing to gameplay is jsut plain false Originally posted by Enso Gummiel:Well guys, we know what to do now :P, who starts the first thread? You know this isn't the first attempt to bring up this nice to have gimmick.